Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful

ietf-dkim

Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful

2006-03-24 12:16:42

> That happened because I did a "reply all" on your message, my MUA
> populated the To: header field with your address and the CC: header
> field with the list address.  Everybody got a message that said To:
> arvel(_dot_)hathcock(_at_)altn(_dot_)com

Thanks!  Sorry if I wasted anyone's time.

--
Arvel


_______________________________________________

NOTE WELL: This list operates according tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, (continued) Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Arvel Hathcock Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Jim Fenton 1193 Proposal Benefits: [Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful], Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Arvel Hathcock Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, william(at)elan.net Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Jim Fenton Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Arvel Hathcock <= Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Russ Housley

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Jim Fenton
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Barry Leiba
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Jim Fenton
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful, Douglas Otis
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]