Re: [ietf-dkim] Recommend not adding DNS RR(s) into DKIM base doc

Mark Delany wrote:
> In summary, regardless of the merits or otherwise, of splitting the
> base document, I would prefer that the base not-subsume the DKK RR and
> presumably the Policy/Practice/Preference/Percolator RR or whatever it
> will be called.
>   
Agreed.  Letting the design process of the DKK and DKP RRs go forward in
parallel is a substantial benefit.

-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html