At 4:54 PM -0800 3/30/06, Jim Fenton wrote:
I'm concerned that including verification results is going to introduce
a whole bunch of new semantics (and possibly transitive trust) to the
multiple-signature case.
I am hearing a whole bunch of push-back and no support for the
verification passthrough. Unless support appears in the next few
days, I'll revise the proposal to remove it. I'll also change the
"simple canonicalization" as well.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html