IETF DKIM (thread)
[ietf-dkim] r= for instilling good domain-name practices,
Douglas Otis,
2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] r= for instilling good domain-name practices, J.D. Falk, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] r= for instilling good domain-name practices, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] r= for instilling good domain-name practices, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] r= for instilling good domain-name practices, Eliot Lear, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] r= for instilling good domain-name practices, John Levine, 2006/04/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] r= for instilling good domain-name practices, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] r= for instilling good domain-name practices, John L, 2006/04/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] r= for instilling good domain-name practices, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] r= for instilling good domain-name practices, John R Levine, 2006/04/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] r= for instilling good domain-name practices, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] r= for instilling good domain-name practices, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/29
[ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers,
Arvel Hathcock,
2006/04/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/04/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, Tony Hansen, 2006/04/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, william(at)elan.net, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, Eric Allman, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, Hector Santos, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, Eric Allman, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, william(at)elan.net, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, Eric Allman, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, william(at)elan.net, 2006/04/28
- What the verifier can do (was: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers ), Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/29
- [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/29
- [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Hector Santos, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Hector Santos, 2006/04/30
- [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Tony Hansen, 2006/04/30
- [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, william(at)elan.net, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Eric Rescorla, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Eric Rescorla, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Eric Rescorla, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Eric Rescorla, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, william(at)elan.net, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Eric Rescorla, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Tony Hansen, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: What the verifier can do, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, Tony Hansen, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, Hector Santos, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, Tony Hansen, 2006/04/28
[ietf-dkim] dkim-base: _domainkey vs _dkim,
Hector Santos,
2006/04/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base: _domainkey vs _dkim, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base: _domainkey vs _dkim, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base: _domainkey vs _dkim, Eliot Lear, 2006/04/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base: _domainkey vs _dkim, Hector Santos, 2006/04/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base: _domainkey vs _dkim, Eliot Lear, 2006/04/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base: _domainkey vs _dkim, Hector Santos, 2006/04/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base: _domainkey vs _dkim, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base: _domainkey vs _dkim, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base: _domainkey vs _dkim, Mark Delany, 2006/04/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base: _domainkey vs _dkim, Jim Fenton, 2006/04/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base: _domainkey vs _dkim, Mark Delany, 2006/04/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base: _domainkey vs _dkim, Hector Santos, 2006/04/26
[ietf-dkim] Body Length mechanism rejections,
Douglas Otis,
2006/04/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Body Length mechanism rejections, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Body Length mechanism rejections, Jim Fenton, 2006/04/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Body Length mechanism rejections, Eric Allman, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Body Length mechanism rejections, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Body Length mechanism rejections, Mark Delany, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Body Length mechanism rejections, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Body Length mechanism rejections, Hector Santos, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Body Length mechanism rejections, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Body Length mechanism rejections, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Body Length mechanism rejections, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/28
[ietf-dkim] Notes from DKIM jabber meeting on 20 April 2006,
DKIM Chair,
2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Notes from DKIM jabber meeting on 20 April 2006, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Notes from DKIM jabber meeting on 20 April 2006, Sandy Wills, 2006/04/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Notes from DKIM jabber meeting on 20 April 2006, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Notes from DKIM jabber meeting on 20 April 2006, Hector Santos, 2006/04/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Notes from DKIM jabber meeting on 20 April 2006, Sandy Wills, 2006/04/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Notes from DKIM jabber meeting on 20 April 2006, Hector Santos, 2006/04/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Notes from DKIM jabber meeting on 20 April 2006, Eliot Lear, 2006/04/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Notes from DKIM jabber meeting on 20 April 2006, John Levine, 2006/04/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Notes from DKIM jabber meeting on 20 April 2006, Sandy Wills, 2006/04/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Notes from DKIM jabber meeting on 20 April 2006, Hector Santos, 2006/04/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Notes from DKIM jabber meeting on 20 April 2006, Jon Callas, 2006/04/25
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM verification actors, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/21
[ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=,
Stephen Farrell,
2006/04/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=, Hector Santos, 2006/04/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=, Hector Santos, 2006/04/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=, Jon Callas, 2006/04/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=, Eliot Lear, 2006/04/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x= with DSN considerations, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=, Jim Fenton, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=, Mark Delany, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Format for t=, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Format for t=, Tony Hansen, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Format for t=, ned+dkim, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Format for t=, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Format for t=, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/04/21
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=, Bill.Oxley, 2006/04/19
[ietf-dkim] Expiration Tag (x=) is required to minimize DNS lookups.,
Hector Santos,
2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Expiration Tag (x=) is required to minimize DNS lookups., Mark Delany, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Expiration Tag (x=) is required to minimize DNS lookups., Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Expiration Tag (x=) is required to minimize DNS lookups., Hector Santos, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Expiration Tag (x=) is required to minimize DNS lookups., Steve Atkins, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Expiration Tag (x=) is required to minimize DNSlookups., Hector Santos, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Expiration Tag (x=) is required to minimize DNSlookups., Steve Atkins, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Expiration Tag (x=) is required to minimizeDNSlookups., Hector Santos, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Expiration Tag (x=) is required to minimize DNS lookups., Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Expiration Tag (x=) is required to minimize DNSlookups., Hector Santos, 2006/04/18
[ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error,
Hector Santos,
2006/04/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Scott Kitterman, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Jim Fenton, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Hector Santos, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Jim Fenton, 2006/04/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Hector Santos, 2006/04/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Jim Fenton, 2006/04/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Scott Kitterman, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Scott Kitterman, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Hector Santos, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Scott Kitterman, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Jim Fenton, 2006/04/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Hector Santos, 2006/04/21
- RE: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Bill.Oxley, 2006/04/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, Hector Santos, 2006/04/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-01: 6.2 - DNS error, John Levine, 2006/04/22
[ietf-dkim] Proposal: Do the semantics first, then straw poll,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip,
2006/04/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Do the semantics first, then straw poll, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Do the semantics first, then straw poll, Tony Hansen, 2006/04/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Do the semantics first, then straw poll, Jon Callas, 2006/04/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Do the semantics first, then straw poll, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Do the semantics first, then straw poll, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Do the semantics first, then straw poll, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Do the semantics first, then straw poll, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Do the semantics first, then straw poll, Jon Callas, 2006/04/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Do the semantics first, then straw poll, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Do the semantics first, then straw poll, Jim Fenton, 2006/04/18
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Do the semantics first, then straw poll, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/04/14
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Do the semantics first, then straw poll, Bill.Oxley, 2006/04/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Do the semantics first, then straw poll, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/04/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Do the semantics first, then straw poll, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/18
RE: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip,
2006/04/12
- RE: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, william(at)elan.net, 2006/04/12
- RE: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos, 2006/04/12
- RE: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/04/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos, 2006/04/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Mark Delany, 2006/04/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos, 2006/04/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos, 2006/04/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos, 2006/04/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos, 2006/04/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos, 2006/04/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Scott Kitterman, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] authentication result headers are an unsafe alternative, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] authentication result headers are an unsafe alternative, Scott Kitterman, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] authentication result headers are an unsafe alternative, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Scott Kitterman, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/18
- [ietf-dkim] Collecting SMTP delivery data., Lyndon Nerenberg, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collecting SMTP delivery data., Hector Santos, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM in the MUA should not be the goal, just a side benifit, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/18
- RE: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/04/13
- RE: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Bill.Oxley, 2006/04/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Steve Atkins, 2006/04/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/04/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, John Levine, 2006/04/14
- [ietf-dkim] Key Retention and Rollover Stategies, Hector Santos, 2006/04/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos, 2006/04/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Jim Fenton, 2006/04/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/04/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos, 2006/04/15
- RE: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Bill.Oxley, 2006/04/14
[ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?,
Dave Crocker,
2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/11
- Re[2]: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Jonathan Clark, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/11
- Re[2]: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Jonathan Clark, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/11
- Re[2]: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Jonathan Clark, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Mark Delany, 2006/04/11
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM: transit-only?, Jonathan Clark, 2006/04/12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM: transit-only?, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/12
- Re[2]: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Jonathan Clark, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/11
- Re[2]: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Jonathan Clark, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Mark Delany, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] multiple keys under same selector+domain?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/11
[ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=,
Stephen Farrell,
2006/04/11
- [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Jonathan Clark, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, John Levine, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Hector Santos, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, william(at)elan.net, 2006/04/11
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Dennis Dayman, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Jim Fenton, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Eliot Lear, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Miles libbey, 2006/04/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/04/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Jim Hill, 2006/04/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Jon Callas, 2006/04/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Tony Hansen, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Hector Santos, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/18
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Bill.Oxley, 2006/04/11
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/04/11
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Bill.Oxley, 2006/04/18
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Jim Fenton, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, william(at)elan.net, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, Mark Delany, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, william(at)elan.net, 2006/04/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Straw poll on x=, william(at)elan.net, 2006/04/20
[ietf-dkim] DKIM-BASE-00: Proposed Expiration Tag (x=) Description Change,
Hector Santos,
2006/04/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM-BASE-00: Proposed Expiration Tag (x=) Description Change, Mark Delany, 2006/04/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM-BASE-00: Proposed Expiration Tag (x=)Description Change, Hector Santos, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM-BASE-00: Proposed Expiration Tag (x=)Description Change, Mark Delany, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM-BASE-00: Proposed Expiration Tag (x=)Description Change, Eliot Lear, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM-BASE-00: Proposed Expiration Tag (x=)Description Change, Hector Santos, 2006/04/12
- [ietf-dkim] Why I think there's something wrong with Expiration, Eliot Lear, 2006/04/12
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Why I think there's something wrong with Expiration, Hector Santos, 2006/04/12
[ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=,
Paul Hoffman,
2006/04/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, John Levine, 2006/04/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, william(at)elan.net, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Hector Santos, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Eliot Lear, 2006/04/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/04/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, John Levine, 2006/04/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Jim Fenton, 2006/04/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, John R Levine, 2006/04/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Mark Delany, 2006/04/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, william(at)elan.net, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Mark Delany, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, william(at)elan.net, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Jim Fenton, 2006/04/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, John L, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, John R Levine, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, John R Levine, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Hector Santos, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Hector Santos, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Hector Santos, 2006/04/12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Jim Fenton, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, John L, 2006/04/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Hector Santos, 2006/04/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Mark Delany, 2006/04/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Bill.Oxley, 2006/04/08
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/08
- [ietf-dkim] Updated proposal: get rid of x=, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/08
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Bill.Oxley, 2006/04/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/04/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/04/10
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=, Bill.Oxley, 2006/04/10
[ietf-dkim] Revised proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures,
Paul Hoffman,
2006/04/04
- [mtcc.com alert] Re: [ietf-dkim] Revised proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Revised proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Revised proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/04
- [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Paul Hoffman, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/04/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/04/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/05
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Dennis Dayman, 2006/04/04
Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures,
Stephen Farrell,
2006/04/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Barry Leiba, 2006/04/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Michael Thomas, 2006/04/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/04/03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Eric Rescorla, 2006/04/03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Stephen Farrell, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Eric Rescorla, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Eric Rescorla, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/04/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Douglas Otis, 2006/04/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics formultiple signatures, Hector Santos, 2006/04/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics formultiple signatures, Barry Leiba, 2006/04/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics formultiple signatures, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics formultiple signatures, Barry Leiba, 2006/04/03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics formultiple signatures, Dave Crocker, 2006/04/03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax andsemantics formultiple signatures, Hector Santos, 2006/04/03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics formultiple signatures, Steve Atkins, 2006/04/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semanticsformultiple signatures, Hector Santos, 2006/04/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semanticsformultiple signatures, Barry Leiba, 2006/04/03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax andsemanticsformultiple signatures, Hector Santos, 2006/04/03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/04/03