Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 4:13 PM -0700 4/11/06, Michael Thomas wrote:
If there are "silly states", they apply equally to removing a selector
from the DNS. So removing x= from the spec does not relieve us of that
exercise.
Again, that is completely, and demonstratively, wrong. If you remove the
selector from the DNS, verification fails predictably at the time the
recipient tries. The x= semantics say that a signature can be valid at
one moment and invalid at the next. Note the difference between those two.
There is no difference in my code. Beyond the logging, they are
treated identically. What is your code doing differently?
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html