ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures

2006-04-04 08:49:50


Douglas Otis wrote:
Sorry, I still don't understand what the purpose or impact of this attack is. Can you explain?

An attack may be enabled by replaying a message compromised due to a weak hash, key, or canonicalization algorithm.


You didn't answer his question (or, by derivation, mine.)

d/
--

Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>