ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures

2006-04-05 04:53:46
> The validator either considers a signature "strong" enough or they
> don't.  That choice is the validator's and it does not matter in the
> least whether the signer agrees.

Correct!  That is my view on the matter also.

--
Arvel



_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>