> To the extent that the working group might wish to specify normative
> behavior, I suspect that Choice #1 should be a MUST NOT and probably
> the same for #2.
I hope the spec doesn't get into putting requirements like that in
place. It would be a burden on deploying DKIM in small operations that
depend on others for DNS management.
--
Arvel
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html