Re: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain

ietf-dkim

Re: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain

2006-04-28 13:20:26

 > It seems defining the state of the signature rather than possible
 > remedies would be more useful.


phoffman> Fully agree.

arvel> This makes sense to me as well.

So is there consensus that this change belongs in -02?

eric

_______________________________________________

NOTE WELL: This list operates according tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain, Paul Hoffman Re: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain, Arvel Hathcock Re: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain, Eric Allman <= Re: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain, Jim Fenton RE: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain, Bill.Oxley Re: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain, Eric Allman Re: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain, Stephen Farrell

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] z= question with X headers, Eric Allman
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Body Length mechanism rejections, Eric Allman
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain, Arvel Hathcock
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain, Michael Thomas
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]