Re: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain2006-04-28 13:35:12Eric Allman wrote: > It seems defining the state of the signature rather than possible > remedies would be more useful.phoffman> Fully agree. arvel> This makes sense to me as well. So is there consensus that this change belongs in -02? sounds good to me. Mike _______________________________________________NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
|
|