ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain

2006-04-28 13:35:12
Eric Allman wrote:

 > It seems defining the state of the signature rather than possible
 > remedies would be more useful.


phoffman> Fully agree.

arvel> This makes sense to me as well.

So is there consensus that this change belongs in -02?

sounds good to me.

      Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html