Douglas Otis wrote:
When a large portion of a country's population goes on vacation for 5
Exactly what portion is that? I bet a beer that there are more
Swedes that have an email address they never or sporadically
read than there are Swedes that regularly read mail except for
during their supposed 5-week offline. But that's as bogus as
your assertion, since its also based on no data.
If you've got a real distribution, then that'd be interesting.
Deriving/divining a figure of 6.26 days without that isn't
usefully more interesting. Maybe John would like ASRG to
include this as part of their work.
Again, all this is an aside for us. There's no required
correlation between x= and key life cycles. Please stop
flogging that dead horse.
S.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html