-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org on behalf of Douglas Otis
Sent: Fri 4/7/2006 7:56 PM
To: Stephen Farrell
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=
On Apr 7, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
So a signature expiry failure doesn't mean message rejection, same
as if the signature check failed because the message was mangled.
Policy of the receiving domain is out of scope for what we are doing here.
I may choose to ignore DKIM, reject all unsigned or failed signings or a
mixture of both. The document should clearly state that
xs=blah
r=bleh
dkim=string
and what each piece means, no more no less.
thanks,
Bill Oxley
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html