RE: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures

ietf-dkim

2006-04-05 15:05:59

from [SM]


Hello,
At 10:05 05-04-2006, Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com wrote:

Yes, the case indicates importance, much like bold/italic or underline,
not meaning


I believe http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt sums it.

Regards,

-sm

_______________________________________________

NOTE WELL: This list operates according tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Bill.Oxley RE: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Bill.Oxley Message not available RE: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, SM <=

Previous by Date:	{Blocked Content} [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-threats-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
Next by Date:	[ietf-dkim] Issue with threats-02: 1.1 Terminology and Model - SMTP != POP, Hector Santos
Previous by Thread:	RE: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Bill.Oxley
Next by Thread:	[ietf-dkim] Proposal change to 3.6.1 t=y Description, Hector Santos
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]