Section 3.4.5 second to last paragraph "choose to reject" ->
"choose to ignore signatures" [this one isn't a nit]
I'm not sure we have consensus on dropping the "reject" language ---
I think Mark had some concerns. I'll add wording about ignoring the
signature though.
My only concern is to ensure we're not prescriptive to a
verifier. Anywhere we say "reject" probably should be changed to
"treat as unsigned" as long as there is no implication one way or the
other as to what a verifier does with that "is verified" or "is not
verified" knowledge.
Similarly, there should be no "accept" language.
In general, verifier actions are out of scope.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html