ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits

2006-04-29 12:32:41

My only concern is to ensure we're not prescriptive to a
verifier. Anywhere we say "reject" probably should be changed to
"treat as unsigned" as long as there is no implication one way or the
other as to what a verifier does with that "is verified" or "is not
verified" knowledge.

Thank you. We keep confusing the base signing/validating specification with larger policy uses of a signature. We really need to keep the base specification a simple, narrow and mechanical as possible.

d/

--

Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>