On Apr 28, 2006, at 5:18 PM, Eric Allman wrote:
Section 1.1 paragraph 1 is now different from the overview in
-threats. We were trying to keep the top-level description
consistent between the drafts; was this a conscious change?
I don't remember exactly how this came about. I'm happy with
changing it back for consistency, having threats change to be the
same as base, or agreeing to let them drift.
The base draft is what I thought I was agreeing to at the Dallas
meeting. The Threat draft is not correct in my view.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html