Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility

   Signatures with selectors resulting in NXDOMAIN DNS querys SHOULD NOT
   be considered valid?


I have to check the spec, but I thought that you set p= to the empty
string and leave the Selector in place if you wish to revoke the key.


Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, william(at)elan.net Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos RE: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Paul Hoffman Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos RE: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Mark Delany <= Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility, Douglas Otis