ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] x= lets senders expire responsibility

2006-04-12 09:46:57

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "william(at)elan.net" <william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net>
To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com>


On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

I disagree.

I think the semantics are 'don't count on being able to 
verify this message after this date'.

This is signer's policy information. From what I've seen so far its 
largely the same set of people who are against this as those against
what you call SSP. I'm afraid this maybe a light prelude to what
you'll see in SSP debates....

Ha! You got that right!

Boy did you make my day. :-)

-- 
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com



_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html