Two questions:
1. Is this to be considered the 'current' DKIM
specification? That is, should new implementations
follow this?
2. Shouldn't this new draft recommend a signature
'Version' value? The new bh/b hashing scheme does not
seem to be compatible with that in 'draft-allman-dkim-base-01'...
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html