Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: get rid of x=

> What's the practical advantage of having x=?  What do I get that I
> wouldn't get with simply assuming that verifying a message 2 weeks
> past the last received header is probably not such a hot idea?

Parsing and dealing with the value in x= is probably easier code than 
doing the same with a date-stamp from a Received header.
--
Arvel



_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html