On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Michael Thomas wrote:
The alternative is to just put normative guidance in the document to the
effect that x= MUST be greater than t=+2weeks, and less than t=+2 months
or something, and that it SHOULD be set to t=+4 weeks.
I guess I worry a little about codifying an _exact_ number.
You could make "x" optional and specify defai;t va;ies one may assume
if its not present, but allow sender to override it by actually
specifying "x" value in the signature.
---
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html