And this is from a person who has a nasty habit of censoring and banning
people from his so called anti-spam research areas. If you were ignoring
me, and you know you don't, you wouldn't have read the message.
Ignore me if you want. I won't ignore you. The fact is, certified mail
concepts raises the legal bar. You come to realized this yourself, finally.
It is worth repeating:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/california_frets_about_goodmail_email/
....
In the questions that followed we learned several
interesting things. One is that AOL and Goodmail both agree
that they are responsible for the mail they stamp, to the extent
that if a phish or virus sneaks through with a stamp, they're
on the hook for damages. This is something new in the world
of e-mail.
....
---
HLS
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Levine" <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com>
To: <ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org>
Cc: <phoffman(_at_)proper(_dot_)com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=
In article <p06230994c06c40383545(_at_)[10(_dot_)20(_dot_)30(_dot_)249]> you
write:
At 2:37 PM -0400 4/19/06, Hector Santos wrote:
Try ignoring Hector. Just about everyone else does.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html