Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=

Jim Fenton wrote:

> I'm not sure I want to start another discussion about the "t=" tag like
> we had about the "x=" tag, but I'm even less sure what to do with t=. 
> Do we want to base the format on that of t=?
>  
Do statistics and forensics count for nothing these days?

      Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html