Re: [ietf-dkim] Format for t=

> However, I don't think we have to switch.

Neither do I.

--
Arvel

_______________________________________________

NOTE WELL: This list operates according tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x= with DSN considerations, (continued) RE: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x= with DSN considerations, Bill.Oxley Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x= with DSN considerations, Scott Kitterman Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x= with DSN considerations, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=, Jim Fenton Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=, Mark Delany Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] Format for t=, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Format for t=, Tony Hansen Re: [ietf-dkim] Format for t=, ned+dkim Re: [ietf-dkim] Format for t=, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Format for t=, Arvel Hathcock <= RE: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=, Bill.Oxley Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=, Douglas Otis