Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue with threats-02: 1.1 Terminology and Model

On 4/5/06, Hector Santos <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com> wrote:

I suggest the change to:

    This is an intentional decision made to allow verification
    of messages via other mail submission protocols protocols other than
SMTP, such as POP [RFC1939] and IMAP [RFC3501]


IMAP and POP are far far less mail *submission* protocols than they
are transmission protocols.

-Rob

--
Rob Siemborski        |     PGP:0x5CE32FCC    |     
robsiemb(_at_)google(_dot_)com
Software Engineer     |                       |            650-623-6925

_______________________________________________

NOTE WELL: This list operates according tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
{Blocked Content} [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-threats-02.txt, Internet-Drafts [ietf-dkim] Issue with threats-02: 1.1 Terminology and Model - SMTP != POP, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue with threats-02: 1.1 Terminology and Model - SMTP != POP, Rob Siemborski <=

Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue with threats-02: 1.1 Terminology and Model - SMTP != POP