The longer I think about this, the more I am of the opinion that we
shouldn't talk about 400-ing in the -base specification.
...
> I'd suggest that we just remove the mention of special responses to key
retrieval failures in -base, and put them in the overview document as a
deployment option.
Exactly right. This is a specification concerning the message object, not
concerning message transport, even though it pertains to the object "while in
transit."
Anything about DKIM that involves SMTP is probably going to need an ESTMP
option. I suspect that that is out of scope.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html