Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures

> the case of a should does not change its semantics.
>
> if the text specifies behavior, it is being normative.

Are you saying a 'SHOULD' and a 'should' have essentially the same meaning?

--
Arvel



_______________________________________________

NOTE WELL: This list operates according tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, (continued) Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Paul Hoffman Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Paul Hoffman Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Paul Hoffman Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Paul Hoffman Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Arvel Hathcock Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Arvel Hathcock <= Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Douglas Otis RE: [ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures, Dennis Dayman