Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 3:32 PM -0700 4/24/06, Jim Fenton wrote:
More good questions. "I, the sender, want this to not be able to be
validated after this date" is all well and good, but the sender's
wishes go directly against the recipient's wishes, which are to have
as many validated messages as possible.
That's not correct. The receiver's motivation is to defend itself.
Validating messages
a priori does not do that. If a sender through its own policy says
"don't trust/honor/blame me
this after this time", why should a receiver not honor that? That
information only negatively
reflects on the message, so a receiver should be happy to know.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html