At 8:51 AM -0700 4/21/06, Michael Thomas wrote:
I think you've got this turned completely inside out. I'm not trying
to say what an
MUA MUST do. I'm saying that we should define the conditions under which DKIM
signature verification is supposed to work. This may work for some
MUA's, and it
may not. If an MUA can meet those conditions and find DKIM
verification useful,
by all means.
Ah, good! Sorry for misunderstanding your earlier message.
But please don't come back and say that DKIM is broken because it
requires temporal, and other conditions that DKIM was not designed to support.
I promise I won't. :-)
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html