Michael Thomas <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com> writes:
If we ever move to a new signing algorithm that doesn't encrypt like RSA
does, it seems like that might be a worthwhile thing to do. As it
stands now,
we don't have the need so it would probably not do much more than add
confusion.
That's fine, but if we believe that in order to have an operational
system you're going to need to be able to do signature message
recovery in some way, I think that needs to be explicitly stated
somewhere, not just left silent.
-Ekr
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html