On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 07:13:11AM -0400, Hector Santos allegedly wrote:
Any who, I think it is useful. Whether how useful it is for the signer, it
open to many interpretations based on what role you are playing.
And that's a bit of a concern to me. A signer may use it for one
purpose, some verifiers another and different set of verifiers (or MTA
packages) for a third purpose.
That "fuzzy" semantic use seems to mean that we'll end up with a
signer never knowing for sure exactly what the outcome will be.
I guess what I was hoping for is a crisp set of instructions to
deployers as to what they should set, why they should set it and what
outcome they can expect as a consequence.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html