Jonathan Clark wrote:
My thought here was that the primary use of multiple signatures is for
rolling keys (and/or algorithms).
The motivation is rolling algorithms, not keys. And that's _a_ reason,
but not the only reason.
You slap a new key under the existing
selector and sign messages with both keys, so preserving signature
validity for old messages. Doug points out that squeezing 2 keys into
one (TXT?) record may be a tight fit :-)
Selector namespace is cheap; there's just no motivation I've
seen to try to recycle it. Why even try?
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html