At 9:20 AM -0700 4/25/06, Douglas Otis wrote:
,---
|3.4.5 Body Length Limits
|...
| Note that verifiers MAY choose to reject or truncate messages that
| have body content beyond that specified by the body length count.
'___
change to:
: Note that verifiers MAY choose to truncate messages that have body
: content beyond that specified by the body length count.
While use of l= should be depreciated, it seems disruptive to have
this mechanism possibly induce the rejection of messages. The
general goal should have all DKIM compliant MTA make the same basic
choice of whether a mechanism is acceptable or not.
Agree. This is the only place where rejecting the message based on
verification faults is mentioned.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html