Results are in:
Keep (8)
jonathan(_dot_)clark(_at_)mirapoint(_dot_)com
mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com
hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com
Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com
pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com
william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net
dennis(_at_)thenose(_dot_)net
jon(_at_)callas(_dot_)org
Remove (9)
johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com
dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org
phoffman(_at_)proper(_dot_)com
MarkD+dkim(_at_)yahoo-inc(_dot_)com
lear(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com
fenton(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com
mlibbeymail-mailsig(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)com
dkim(_at_)mx(_dot_)rdns(_dot_)org (Jim Hill)
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com
And that includes a vote that changed sides! Let me know
if I've missed anyone, but I suspect it won't make a
difference really.
So there is no clear consensus to delete x=, therefore
we go with the status quo.
Could I ask that someone try propose text for the draft
to clarify the meaning of x=, bearing in mind all of
the list discussion?
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html