If a MUA is the signer I would hope it is within its own administrative
domain. I haven't seen one yet that was outside of its own domain.
Thanks,
Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications, Inc.
Alpharetta GA
404-847-6397
bill(_dot_)oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Douglas Otis
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 1:39 PM
To: IETF-DKIM
Subject: [ietf-dkim] 2.1 Signers // Within an administrative domain?
,---
| 2.1 Signers
|...
| The key issue is that a message must be signed before it
| leaves the administrative domain of the signer.
'---
What is intended by this statement? How does this relate to messages
signed by an MUA, which is not mentioned as a possible signer? Is
this statement intended to preclude the use of MUA signed messages?
(Use of the word "key" appears to be a poor choice of words.)
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html