ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: dkim-base-01 nits and semi-nits

2006-05-02 23:34:13

"Treat as unsigned" seems a little ambiguous when there might be
multiple signatures.  It might be interpreted as "treat the message as
though it is completely unsigned" as opposed to "consider this signature
invalid" which I think is your intent.
I don't think the wording "consider this signature invalid" requires the
verifier to consider a signature failure as "unsigned".


When a signature fails to validate, the message should be processed as
if that signature is not present.

d/

--

Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html