ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] multiple query mechanisms, was Today's jabber

2006-05-19 12:24:51
Paul Hoffman wrote:

That assumes that the two are now and evermore identical. I don't think that's
a very good assumption, which is why SHOULD above makes sense.


Can you give an example of how you think the two might differ in light of:
   If there are
   multiple query mechanisms listed, the choice of query mechanism
   MUST NOT change the interpretation of the signature.

That point is under discussion. It is not decided.

      Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html