Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains

> Sadly, on some lists, moot is not a precursor to mute.

Ha ha... that's very true.

--
Arvel


_______________________________________________

NOTE WELL: This list operates according tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, (continued) Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, william(at)elan.net Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Steve Atkins Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Paul Hoffman Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Eric Allman Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Arvel Hathcock Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Mark Delany Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1265: Signing by parent domains, Arvel Hathcock <=