Douglas Otis wrote:
A DKIM implementer might also need to include DKIM related security
terms and conditions with private providers in conjunction with future
or existing services as related to the publishing of DKIM keys and their
use. This is a new security related element independent of normal
domain delegation obligations.
I have no idea what this means, so I'm virtually certain I'm not going
to do it.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html