IETF DKIM (date)
June 27, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Mark Delany, 13:19
- {Blocked Content} [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, 12:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Tony Hansen, 11:59
- [ietf-dkim] agenda slots..., Stephen Farrell, 10:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Arvel Hathcock, 09:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Mark Delany, 08:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Jon Callas, 06:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Dave Crocker, 05:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Stephen Farrell, 05:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Douglas Otis, 05:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Dave Crocker, 05:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Dave Crocker, 05:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Dave Crocker, 04:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, J.D. Falk, 04:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Jon Callas, 03:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, John Levine, 03:00
June 26, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Michael Thomas, 11:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Michael Thomas, 11:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Barry Leiba, 11:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Michael Thomas, 10:28
- [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization, Paul Hoffman, 10:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Douglas Otis, 07:48
June 24, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Summary of jabber meeting of 22 June, John R Levine, 16:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Dave Crocker, 12:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Barry Leiba, 12:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Summary of jabber meeting of 22 June, Eric Allman, 10:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Summary of jabber meeting of 22 June, Eliot Lear, 07:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Summary of jabber meeting of 22 June, John Levine, 04:06
June 22, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Douglas Otis, 15:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Stephen Farrell, 14:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Summary of jabber meeting of 22 June, Michael Thomas, 14:11
- [ietf-dkim] Summary of jabber meeting of 22 June, Barry Leiba, 13:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Dave Crocker, 13:20
- {Blocked Content} [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, 12:59
- [ietf-dkim] issue 1287 (signature removal), Eric Allman, 12:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Douglas Otis, 12:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Michael Thomas, 11:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Eric Allman, 10:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Use of "sender" in -base, Eric Allman, 10:08
- [ietf-dkim] Base-02 //Deprecated Signature Version & New List, Douglas Otis, 07:21
- [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: DKIM - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 66], Stephen Farrell, 04:42
June 16, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Douglas Otis, 17:53
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, ned+dkim, 17:46
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Douglas Otis, 16:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Paul Hoffman, 15:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Stephen Farrell, 15:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Douglas Otis, 15:45
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Douglas Otis, 15:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Dave Crocker, 14:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] auth header in Montreal agenda, other than base, Douglas Otis, 14:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] auth header in Montreal agenda, other than base, Dave Crocker, 14:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification on z=, Eric Allman, 14:37
- [ietf-dkim] Re: draft-dkim-pcon, Douglas Otis, 10:38
- [ietf-dkim] RE: draft-dkim-pcon, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:37
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Considerations for Development of DKIM Policy Language, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:07
June 15, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] Re: draft-dkim-pcon, Douglas Otis, 23:01
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Considerations for Development of DKIM Policy Language, Paul Hoffman, 21:09
- [ietf-dkim] RE: draft-dkim-pcon, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:42
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Considerations for Development of DKIM Policy Language, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Considerations for Development of DKIM Policy Language, Jim Fenton, 17:06
- [ietf-dkim] draft-dkim-pcon, Douglas Otis, 15:34
- [ietf-dkim] wg pending issues list now cited on web page, Dave Crocker, 11:11
June 14, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] Considerations for Development of DKIM Policy Language, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, Douglas Otis, 16:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification on z=, Arvel Hathcock, 15:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification on z=, Arvel Hathcock, 15:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification on z=, Arvel Hathcock, 15:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, Steve Atkins, 15:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification on z=, Michael Thomas, 15:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, John Levine, 15:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, Michael Thomas, 15:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, Jim Fenton, 14:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification on z=, Eric Allman, 14:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, Steve Atkins, 14:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, J.D. Falk, 14:29
- [ietf-dkim] Use of DKIM signatures by mailing lists, Jim Fenton, 14:09
- [ietf-dkim] Last Call: 'Analysis of Threats Motivating DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-dkim-threats), The IESG, 10:36
June 10, 2006
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Bill.Oxley, 21:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification on z=, Arvel Hathcock, 14:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] issue with relaxed body canonicalization?, Arvel Hathcock, 14:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification on z=, Michael Thomas, 13:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification on z=, Michael Thomas, 13:49
- [ietf-dkim] Clarification on z=, Arvel Hathcock, 13:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] issue with relaxed body canonicalization?, Paul Hoffman, 08:24
June 09, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user(_at_)sub(_dot_)example(_dot_)com vs. user(_at_)example(_dot_)com, was Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis, 18:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] user(_at_)sub(_dot_)example(_dot_)com vs. user(_at_)example(_dot_)com, was Underscore considerations, John Levine, 17:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis, 15:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, John Levine, 15:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis, 15:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Jim Fenton, 15:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Michael Thomas, 15:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Stephen Farrell, 14:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Jim Fenton, 14:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Jim Fenton, 14:15
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Stephen Farrell, 13:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1288: definition of 'signing address', Jim Fenton, 13:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Stephen Farrell, 13:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Stephen Farrell, 13:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] issue with relaxed body canonicalization?, Michael Thomas, 13:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis, 13:33
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] issue with relaxed body canonicalization?, Tony Hansen, 13:10
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, John Levine, 11:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] issue with relaxed body canonicalization?, John Levine, 11:01
- [ietf-dkim] issue with relaxed body canonicalization?, Tony Hansen, 10:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Steve Atkins, 08:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Eliot Lear, 08:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Steve Atkins, 08:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issues needing tracking, Eliot Lear, 07:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Paul Hoffman, 07:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Stephen Farrell, 07:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1288: definition of 'signing address', Stephen Farrell, 07:23
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis, 07:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issues needing tracking, Douglas Otis, 06:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issues needing tracking, Eliot Lear, 06:02
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Bill.Oxley, 05:58
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1287: signature removal, Michael Thomas, 01:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis, 00:07
June 08, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1287: signature removal, John L, 21:29
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Issue 1287: signature removal, Michael Thomas, 21:25
- [ietf-dkim] Issue 1287: signature removal, John Levine, 21:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, SM, 21:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Dave Crocker, 19:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Paul Hoffman, 18:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1288: definition of 'signing address', Dave Crocker, 18:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis, 18:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Michael Thomas, 17:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1288: definition of 'signing address', Michael Thomas, 17:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis, 17:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Michael Thomas, 17:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1288: definition of 'signing address', Jim Fenton, 17:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1288: definition of 'signing address', Dave Crocker, 17:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Dave Crocker, 17:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Jim Fenton, 17:29
- [ietf-dkim] Issue 1288: definition of 'signing address', Jim Fenton, 17:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Jim Fenton, 17:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Michael Thomas, 17:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Paul Hoffman, 17:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis, 17:16
- [ietf-dkim] base-02 // Parent signing security considerations/ summation, Douglas Otis, 17:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Douglas Otis, 17:03
- [ietf-dkim] Underscore considerations, Jim Fenton, 16:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issues needing tracking, Douglas Otis, 13:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issues needing tracking, Stephen Farrell, 12:37
- [ietf-dkim] Issues needing tracking, Douglas Otis, 11:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Use of "sender" in -base, Dave Crocker, 10:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Use of "sender" in -base, Paul Hoffman, 10:10
- [ietf-dkim] base progressing towards WG last call, Stephen Farrell, 09:37
- [ietf-dkim] Use of "sender" in -base, Dave Crocker, 08:47
- RE: [ietf-dkim] base-02 // worst-case scenario/duration of exploit/useof deprecated, Douglas Otis, 07:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] jabber again today, Douglas Otis, 06:39
- RE: [ietf-dkim] base-02 // worst-case scenario/duration of exploit/useof deprecated, Bill.Oxley, 06:16
- [ietf-dkim] nit: section 6.1, Eliot Lear, 05:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Barry Leiba, 05:28
- [ietf-dkim] jabber again today, Barry Leiba, 05:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Stephen Farrell, 01:37
June 07, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] base-02 // Parent signing security considerations v.2, Douglas Otis, 18:49
- [ietf-dkim] base-02 // "b=" tag deletion only on the signature created or verified, Douglas Otis, 18:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] base-02 // Parent signing security considerations v.2, Michael Thomas, 18:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] base-02 // Parent signing security considerations v.2, Paul Hoffman, 18:14
- [ietf-dkim] base-02 // Parent signing security considerations v.2, Douglas Otis, 17:59
- [ietf-dkim] base-02 // worst-case scenario/duration of exploit/use of deprecated, Douglas Otis, 17:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Jim Fenton, 15:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] auth header in Montreal agenda, other than base, Stephen Farrell, 14:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] auth header in Montreal agenda, other than base, Jim Fenton, 13:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] auth header in Montreal agenda, other than base, John R Levine, 08:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Michael Thomas, 07:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Paul Hoffman, 07:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-02 signature process clarification requested, Stephen Farrell, 07:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-02 signature process clarification requested, Douglas Otis, 07:33
- [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base, Stephen Farrell, 07:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-02 signature process clarification requested, Tony Hansen, 06:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-02 signature process clarification requested, Douglas Otis, 05:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-02 signature process clarification requested, Eliot Lear, 00:01
June 05, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Section 6 rewording, Arvel Hathcock, 21:18
- [ietf-dkim] draft -03b of -base, Eric Allman, 18:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Section 6 rewording, Michael Thomas, 16:47
- [ietf-dkim] Section 6 rewording, Jim Fenton, 15:38
- [ietf-dkim] Rework of sections 6 and 7, Eric Allman, 14:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1287: K... Otis, signature removal, Stephen Farrell, 12:58
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1287: K... Otis, signature removal, william(at)elan.net, 12:38
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1287: K... Otis, signature removal, Bill.Oxley, 12:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1287: K... Otis, signature removal, Barry Leiba, 12:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Douglas Otis, 10:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Michael Thomas, 10:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Douglas Otis, 09:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Eliot Lear, 09:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Michael Thomas, 09:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Eliot Lear, 08:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Eliot Lear, 08:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 //a= algorithm ABNF, Paul Hoffman, 08:08
- [ietf-dkim] Remainder of last jabber not covered + new issue, Douglas Otis, 08:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft changes discussed in Thursday Jabber session, Barry Leiba, 07:23
- [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 //a= algorithm ABNF, Douglas Otis, 01:23
June 01, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Michael Thomas, 18:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Douglas Otis, 18:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Paul Hoffman, 18:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Douglas Otis, 17:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Michael Thomas, 17:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Douglas Otis, 17:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Michael Thomas, 15:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing securityconsiderations, Douglas Otis, 13:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Douglas Otis, 13:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing securityconsiderations, Douglas Otis, 12:46
- RE: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing securityconsiderations, Bill.Oxley, 12:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Paul Hoffman, 12:37
- RE: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing securityconsiderations, Bill.Oxley, 12:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Eliot Lear, 12:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Douglas Otis, 12:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, william(at)elan.net, 11:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Stephen Farrell, 11:27
- [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Parent signing security considerations, Douglas Otis, 10:24
- [ietf-dkim] Today's jabber log..., Stephen Farrell, 09:44
- [ietf-dkim] today's jabber agenda, Stephen Farrell, 07:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] base-03: Key lookup parameters, Eric Allman, 07:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] base-02: Normative order of verification steps, Eric Allman, 07:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 typos?, Eric Allman, 07:40
- [ietf-dkim] jabbering today..., Stephen Farrell, 07:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 typos?, Douglas Otis, 00:15
- [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-02 // Signing Address, Douglas Otis, 00:02