On 27 Jun 2006, at 5:24 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
1. Some people wouldn't see an important distinction between PS
and DS
since more-or-less everyone has to implement the PS and few features,
once deployed, are totally deprecated. That might influence
whether or
not you think its useful to remove it now or at DS. OTOH, if everyone
has to support simple regardless of PS vs. DS, then who cares?
There's
no effect on interop.
In addition, DS has become meaningless.
Very few of standard-track documents ever go beyond PS.
Okay, so let me correct the specific data point of DS. We could delay
to WG last call. A year ago, I would have thought that we'd never be
able to drop a canonicalization like relaxed. It looks like that was
pessimistic. I just don't think the time is now to drop it. If we
agreed now to revisit during last call whether it was to stay or go,
I'd be happy.
Jon
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html