On Jun 27, 2006, at 12:28 PM, Jon Callas wrote:
On 26 Jun 2006, at 11:41 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
I'd still like it left in and if it's unused or providing no
value, to remove it
at DS.
I agree with Mike. There's plenty of time to drop it. If we get
closer to DS and experience is showing we don't need it, it's easy
to drop it. It is very difficult to put it back in again if we drop
it now and regret that decision.
I also agree with Mike's view. It would be unfortunate to find some
gateway or MTA is not accommodated which represents some percentage
of users. Until testing is more complete, the minor change afforded
by the relaxed body canonicalization may represent something
statistically significant. If not, it should be removed. Having
information makes this choice an easier call, where removing this
option now will negate an ability to collect information that
isolates the problem.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html