ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization

2006-06-27 05:28:33


1. Some people wouldn't see an important distinction between PS and DS
since more-or-less everyone has to implement the PS and few features,
once deployed, are totally deprecated. That might influence whether or
not you think its useful to remove it now or at DS. OTOH, if everyone
has to support simple regardless of PS vs. DS, then who cares? There's
no effect on interop.


In addition, DS has become meaningless.

Very few of standard-track documents ever go beyond PS.

d/

-- 

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html