Doug,
Your first paragraph below is impossible for me, and I bet, others,
to understand. If you're not clear you'll be ignored, most likely.
Sorry to call this out on the list, but this is far from being the
first time.
So: use fewer words!
Stephen.
Douglas Otis wrote:
The concern about conveying what is a validated email-address has little
to do with MX records using a wildcard. This only relates to why did
this become a problem. Allowing any subdomain within the i= parameter
is to accommodate a wildcard MX technique. This is to reduce the burden
on the transmitter. By requiring a key be referenced from the
email-address domain, this provides a means to validate the domain,
while also limiting the scope of the key.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html