Douglas Otis wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 9:14 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
Now 1287.
Wait a minute, hasn't this been discussed ad nauseum with the clear
consensus to leave this text in?
Do you have a reference to this discussion? The concern raised is
about the normative language in the -base draft regarding the removal
of signatures.
Yes, we've definitely had this conversation before.
It seems a growing portion of email content might become invalid
signatures.
I've seen exactly the opposite.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html