Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification on z=

> Given how simple our qp-like encoding is, I think you might be right
> to just say in an informational way that it's similar to 2045, but
> really define the encoding ourselves.

I'm happy with that too if it's what you guys want to do.

--
Arvel



_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html