At 2:58 PM -0700 6/16/06, Douglas Otis wrote:
It would be good to have a binary DNS RR defined within the base draft.
Fully disagree. The current protocol (a TXT record that is only used
in namespaces that are specific to the DKIM protocol) is sufficient.
Depending upon how this record is used and what it contains, base64
encoding might exceed the 512 byte message limit, as previously
explained in detail.
... which few (if any) agreed with.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html