Dave Crocker wrote:
Stephen Farrell wrote:
Our main Montreal agenda is for a) finishing base and b) kicking
off SSP-related discussions. (a) seems nicely in-hand.
I suggest that we explicitly solicit some discussion in the meeting with both
Security and DNS experts. We have made some assumptions about what is likely to
be acceptable to each of those communities, yet I suspect we do not have much
feedback yet about their limits.
(I suspect we are in quite good shape, with respect to the Security folks, but I
find myself worried about the DNS constituency.)
Our esteemed AD asked the pertinent question of a DNS directorate
representative in an email on June 4th. (Sorry not to cc the list
with details, but I'm not sure if the individual concerned has
accepted being the contact point yet.)
Haven't heard anything back so far. I'll try get a status update
before the meeting, and we can put it on the agenda, though I
suspect this'll be one of those solved-in-the-corridor type things.
(Dave's right that allergic reactions here could be a cause of delay,
so if any of you have ways of informing/helping/speeding-up the DNS
folks, feel free to give 'em a nudge...)
Regards,
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html