ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base

2006-06-16 16:43:49
 
Defining a DKIM specific RR type should not prevent deployment.   
Defining the DKIM specific RR within the base draft means a 
new DKIM version is not required to enable its use.  If there 
are issues  
handling a DKIM specific RR, this is a problem independent of DKIM.   
A new RR issue, if there are any, may delay exclusive 
reliance upon the DKIM specific RR.

I expect the deployment of DNSSEC to solve the RR problem.

I believe DKIM creates the market for DNSSEC.

If you can't see the problem I know a bunch of philosophers you might want to 
take out to dinner.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html