Well I hate to insist that signers SHOULD do anything but doesn't the
issue of multiple signatures belong in a mail list addendum rather than
base? If I am forwarding should I want to forward an unverifiable
signature over my verifiable one, how would that impact my reputation?
Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications, Inc.
Alpharetta GA
404-847-6397
bill(_dot_)oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 3:18 PM
To: IETF-DKIM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1287: K... Otis, signature removal
Wait a minute, hasn't this been discussed ad nauseum with the clear
consensus to leave this text in?
Signers SHOULD NOT remove any DKIM-Signature header fields from
messages they are signing, even if they know that the signatures
cannot be verified.
Well, it's easy to sort out whether we've had sufficient discussion:
Does anyone support Doug's request to remove this text? If you do,
please respond here by Thursday's jabber chat.
Barry
--
Barry Leiba, Internet Messaging Technology
(leiba(_at_)watson(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com)
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/l/leiba
http://www.research.ibm.com/spam
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html